Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gowry Lekshmi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. ‑Scottywong | soliloquize _ 01:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gowry Lekshmi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails Wikipedia:MUSICIAN, Wikipedia:GNG, lacks RS. Meeanaya (talk) 08:30, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 08:34, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 08:34, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 08:34, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:48, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:48, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Delete - no notabality MaskedSinger (talk) 17:22, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep Satisfy WP:COMPOSER and WP:SINGER. Credited for multiple notable works. Contains multiple independent reliable sources, hence satisfy WP:GNG. Not clear how WP:MUSICIAN applies here as she's not a musician. 137.97.123.57 (talk) 16:49, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the article now has many references to significant coverage in multiple reliable sources such as The Hindu, New Indian Express, DNA and others, so passes WP:GNG and the article is therefore a valid entry imv, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:38, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have no issue with IP editors but when the one and only edit for an IP editor is Strong Keep, I'm highly skeptical of what's going on here.....MaskedSinger (talk) 16:11, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:16, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MrClog (talk) 10:17, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete like the nominator said, subject fails WP:COMPOSER, and WP:SINGER. Most of the mentions of subject are press-releases covering her films, or other ventures. Subject lacks significant coverage, thus making her fail WP:GNG as well. —usernamekiran(talk) 15:07, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- She has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources such as here which are by a bylined journalist and not press releases, there are plenty of other dedicated articles in reliable sources listed in the article which are not press releases Atlantic306 (talk) 19:52, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.