Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Governing Body Commission
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Governing Body Commission (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another ISKCON WP:SPAM article about its management board created to promote its board members and sourced only from self published sites. Wikipedia does not have separate article for company boards, no valid reason for making an exception for this promotional org. Venkat TL (talk) 08:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Venkat TL (talk) 08:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Venkat TL (talk) 08:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment There seems to be some others sources apart from the ISKCON-related websites. If possible, please consider verifying and moving that content to relevant articles. — DaxServer (talk) 18:25, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- @DaxServer I have moved a small part to ISKCON. Hope your concern is resolved. Venkat TL (talk) 13:30, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:39, 10 January 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 04:16, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Easily. Complete and utter lack of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. The coverage is entirely in ISKON sources. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 14:43, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- delete for lack of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, failing significant coverage. The coverage is entirely in ISKON sources, making it primary. Also per Eggishorn —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 05:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.