Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gouri Kishan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was move to draft. BD2412 T 00:05, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gouri Kishan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has previously been deleted under the WP:G11 criterion. I have reviewed those edits, and agree with that speedy deletion. Turning to the version of the article re-created on 14:48, March 15, 2020, it asserted that Ms Kishan was an actress in a number of films without any references. I have added one reference, but it would appear to me that the subject of the article fails the WP:NACTOR test for notability, the various WP:ANYBIO tests, and to be quite frank an WP:IAR test for pure gossip about a living person. Pete AU aka Shirt58 (talk) 10:52, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:01, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:01, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:03, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Even though the article is almost non-existent, I think it's worth keeping. The subject is an up-and-coming actress who has already had supporting roles in a couple of notable films—in particular, '96 (film), which has brought her some fame. She also has some more projects coming up, so I don't think it's too big a deal that the article was created a little prematurely. As for WP:GNG, she's mentioned countless times in Indian news articles, and she also gets coverage that goes beyond mere mentions, like the following:

→https://www.newindianexpress.com/entertainment/malayalam/2019/aug/08/sunny-wayne-gouri-kishan-film-moves-into-post-production-2015591.html – New Indian Express

→https://www.cinemaexpress.com/stories/news/2019/nov/10/gouri-kishan-confirms-being-a-part-of-vijay-lokesh-kanagaraj-s-next-thalapathy-64-15407.html –Cinema Express

→https://www.newindianexpress.com/entertainment/review/2020/feb/08/jaanu-review-an-intimate-love-story-that-largely-works---2100475.html – New Indian Express, brief praise in a film review

→https://www.newindianexpress.com/entertainment/malayalam/2018/dec/13/anugraheethan-antony-is-a-universal-story-1910675.html – New Indian Express

→https://www.deccanchronicle.com/entertainment/movie-reviews/021018/96-movie-review-vijay-sethupathi-trisha-tamil-prem-kumar-best-adhithya.html – Deccan Chronicle, praise in a film review

→https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/tamil/movie-reviews/96/movie-review/66032687.cms – Times of India, brief praise in a film review

→https://www.thehindu.com/entertainment/movies/from-june-to-vikrams-cobra-20-year-old-sarjano-khalids-dream-start-to-his-film-career/article30942188.ece – The Hindu, discussed in relation to another actor

I think that working on the page would be better than outright deleting it. Dflaw4 (talk) 12:13, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Essentially not an article at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:43, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If she gets notable later we can have an article on her. Mccapra (talk) 08:56, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisted per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 March 24.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:50, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Mccapra. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 09:50, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with Mccapra. Not notable currently. - The9Man ^(Talk) 17:57, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I have updated the page. It is now in a workable condition should the page be Draftified or "kept". I would invite the other voters—John Pack Lambert, Mccapra, ~dom Kaos~ and The9Man—to view the page in its current form. Dflaw4 (talk) 03:04, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or draughtify. @Mccapra:, even with your additions, I'm still not convinced that she's currently notable enough to justify her own article: her roles to date appear to be as supporting characters. However, I'm happy for the page to be moved back to draft space if others agree, in anticipation of her upcoming films having widespread cinema release (which, given the current global pandemic's effect on other cinematic releases, is difficult to predict with any certainty). ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 10:19, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.