Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gossip Lanka News

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Materialscientist (talk) 03:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gossip Lanka News[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable news website with no significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:WEB. GSS ^💬 16:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 16:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 16:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete only sources are the website itself and Alexa.com for its ranking. CrazyBoy826 (talk | contribs) 17:25, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:WEBCRIT, nothing notable about it. Less Unless (talk) 19:30, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete awful quality article that appears to be promotional spam. Created by a user with only seven edits, six of which are for this article. All mentions I found seemed to be trivial. Even if it is notable (which I highly doubt), the only way to bring it up to quality standards would be a complete rewrite. Dronebogus (talk) 20:33, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.