Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gordian Knot (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 22:53, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gordian Knot (software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have used this software - collection of otherwise independent tools. It was useful. However, the article does not meet our criteria of notability. It was a favorite tool of peeps who frequent forums and blogs but it never broken the glass ceiling into mainstream notability. As it is no longer developed, it is not going to have any resurgent mention to become notable. Miami33139 (talk) 19:31, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:29, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:08, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral. I've used this software a lot myself too, but there are no third-party sources in the article. However, it's very well-known. There doesn't appear to be any consensus to delete this article, even though it's been round twice now - is that sufficient to keep it? Tevildo (talk) 20:22, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No. Miami33139 (talk) 21:07, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well, then, let's see if anyone wants to add a positive "Delete" !vote, or if the hypothetical closing admin wants to apply WP:GNG off their own bat. :) Tevildo (talk) 21:15, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Easy delete. Two relists and STILL no reliable coverage has come forward. Goodbye, goodnight, and good riddens. JBsupreme (talk) 22:44, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.