Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Googlism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Shanel 00:56, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, and WP is not a crystalball. Delete. — 89p 07:49, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. I saw this domain some years ago in a geek mailing list, so it is possibly notable, (but maybe only spam). (domain registered in September 2002). Cate 08:48, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable: googlism.com has Google rank of 7, Alexa rank of 16,000, and I've certainly seen this website enough. Nothing crystal ball about the article. —Quarl (talk) 2006-04-09 08:48Z
- Keep. How does this fall under crystal ball? Feezo (Talk) 09:12, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep - faintly notable, I guess. Metamagician3000 09:59, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Quarl. ConDemTalk 14:16, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I've used it from time to time over the years. Bige1977 16:18, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unencyclopædic. 1() 17:17, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. - LD444 17:20, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- keep please this is not a crystal ball Yuckfoo 06:39, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- strong keep From Wikipedia:Notability (websites), "The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself. ---"The site has been featured in PCMag.com, About.com and ZDNet.com."Spencerk 23:54, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- What's with all the newbies/puppets (including nominator) voting delete? —Quarl (talk) 2006-04-11 06:44Z
- Keep, per Spencerk. Stifle (talk) 23:26, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.