Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Google Street View in Latin America (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:27, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Google Street View in Latin America[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Content fork of Timeline of Google Street View. The Banner talk 18:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The previous attempt at deletion indicated the sources establish notability. A clear Keep So what has changed? Banner doesn't like it. That's not a reason to delete. Looking at the main article, this presents more concise and focused information about the subject, which is exactly what different articles should do. There is no reason to delete valid content. Trackinfo (talk) 22:31, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Instead of going on with following me around and throwing personal attacks, you could have tried to do your homework. In that case, you should have seen that the content of this article is 100% included in Timeline of Google Street View. But okay, doing negative and assuming bad faith is off course far easier than checking the nomination reasons. The Banner talk 00:22, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase was "this presents more concise and focused information about the subject." The information might be contained on another page, but it is mixed with a mass of information that is not in the way on this article. If this were a transcluded page, would the individual information in the article be any less valuable? Of course not. Trackinfo (talk) 08:32, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 21:19, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This article has more than just what is included in Timeline of Google Street View. It has paragraphs on the background of each country's views. Most of it is properly sourced, and the little info that is lacking sources can be sourced. It has grown since the last Afd, thereby nullifying the points made there. And it is placed in an organized fashion making it easier to understand for a reader concentrated in reading about this region. Sebwite (talk) 20:18, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You suggest that it perhaps a better idea to improve Timeline of Google Street View and this article in such a way that Timeline of Google Street View point to this article, as kind of split off article? The Banner talk 20:23, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Valid spin-off article, not a fork. Carrite (talk) 03:44, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.