Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Google Blogoscoped

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Google Blogoscoped

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Google Blogoscoped (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find multiple reliable, independent sources covering this blog in detail. The (online) sources in the article do not qualify under the WP:GNG guidelines and my WP:BEFORE search only revealed a few articles by TechCrunch which only mention the blog/its contents in passing and do not display notability for the blog itself. The blog also has not been updated since 2011. pinktoebeans ^(talk) 23:36, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. pinktoebeans ^(talk) 23:36, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. pinktoebeans ^(talk) 23:36, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

• Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:WEB.4meter4 (talk) 22:22, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:GNG. Masterhatch (talk) 23:28, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.