Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goof Gas Attack (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:26, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Goof Gas Attack[edit]

Goof Gas Attack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally nominated for PROD by @Piotrus with the reason "Unreferenced article about a TV show's story arc. The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." FASTILY 00:22, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:34, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:35, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per excellent reasoning of Piotrus in this case Spiderone 10:21, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: The content of this article, and most of the others covering individual story arcs in the series, would likely be better suited to a summary episode list (which, unusually, this series does not yet have). Notability/sourcing issues aside, having a full article for each storyline would also arguably fall into the realm of excessive detail. J. Myrle Fuller (talk) 01:08, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This was deleted before as not needed (well unless it was a different article with the same name, which is possible), there is no reason to have this article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:38, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.