Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Time (Paris Hilton song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (WP:SNOW). (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:46, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good Time (Paris Hilton song)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This explains it better. The song passes WP:GNG but fails WP:NSONGS, which states that leaving the notability aside an article about a song is "only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article". The song was released yesterday, and the current information just verify that it exists. If required the text "Good Time is a song by Paris Hilton featuring Lil Wayne. It was written by them and Afrojack, who also produced it. The video was directed by Hannah Lux Davis and was released on October 8 along with the song." can be added to Paris Hilton biography. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:28, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:42, 10 October 2013 (UTC) [reply]

I note that Tbhotch quotes one half of a sentence from NSONGS, "Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article". The second half adds "articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." This article is very, very likely to grow beyond a stub. Drmies (talk) 14:23, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per nominator. Yes, you did not misread this. The nominator said on my talk page that "AFD is useless as the song eventually will chart in the next seven days." Also keep per nominator's statement that "the song passes WP:GNG." There is much more to be written about this composition.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 17:08, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Poorly done AFD. There's plenty of reliable sources out there with information about the single that could be added to the article (just do a quick Google search). An acceptable stub until someone has the time to add the content to the article. I would myself (I generally like to save articles from AFD), but I just don't have the time right now. — Status (talk · contribs) 17:09, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Just listing a few here: An indept article about the song's lyrics, indept article about the music video. — Status (talk · contribs) 17:12, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or redirect. Even if the nominator is correct ("passes WP:GNG but fails WP:NSONGS") that would be a reason to redirect, not to delete. Peter James (talk) 19:31, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for the time being. No article deserves an AfD in 4 days. BTW, If it can pass GNG it must pass NSONGS, but that's another matter. --Richhoncho (talk) 20:50, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - whether or not the song charts, sufficient coverage exists in reliable music sources to meet WP:GNG, WP:NSONGS [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. While there is overlapping material from these examples, I believe there's enough to satisfy the "reasonably detailed article" standard. Gong show 23:44, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - its a very notable single from Paris Hilton and it deserves it own article.--SuperHotWiki (talk) 04:37, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This song will probably chart. Derpian (talk) 09:00, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.