Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Old Boat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 05:29, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good Old Boat[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obvious advertising of an magazine with no reliable, secondary sources listed on the article despite the lovely logo of a boat to the west side of the article. ⇒ Pickbothmanlol 17:26, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: All that I can find for significant coverage is [1]. Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 21:49, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is what I'd usually delete as "notability not asserted". DS (talk) 01:40, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Which is way I think that you shouldn't be an admin. Joe Chill (talk) 02:21, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.