Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Game (2017 TV series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Matt14451 (talk) 11:24, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good Game (2017 TV series)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Fails to gain any reviews or other coverage to satisfy notability. Declined PROD. wumbolo ^^^ 14:50, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article has seen the addition of multiple new sources. The series was produced/distributed by a major streaming service (YouTube Red/YouTube Premium) and was executive produced by a major Hollywood producer (Dan Harmon). Additionally, the reception section features three reviews. – BoogerD (talk) 16:29, 28 September 2018 (UTC
Keep - article now passes WP:GNG due to better sourcing, and WP:NTV is met. Kirbanzo (talk) 17:47, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. One of the reviews that have recently been added is from Wikia, a user-generated wiki, so it is completely unusable. wumbolo ^^^ 17:54, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The review in question was published on the main Fandom website which features its own editorial staff and separate from the other "fan wikis" that the website hosts. The review, for instance, is not able to edited by registered users. Please see Wikia#Entertainment news for verification that the review is not disqualified under WP:UGC. – BoogerD (talk) 18:31, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep With the new addition of new sources, it now meets notability guidelines. Could it still do with some improvement? Sure, but this discussion is about whether or not the article should be deleted, and in its current state it shouldn't. Somethingwickedly (talk) 18:26, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:29, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:29, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Seems pretty notable to me. Polygon, PC Gamer etc reviews provide WP:GNG. 10:08, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

The Polygon and PC Gamer are really routine articles. wumbolo ^^^ 11:43, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep seems to pass WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 22:50, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Despite all the keeper !votes above, I did not find significant coverage that would meet WP:TVSHOW. Yes, the series is verifiable, but that's it. --Bejnar (talk) 02:39, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.