Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Day New York (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:01, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good Day New York[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient notability outside NYC. Seems like a regular newscast. For precedent, see this. CRRays Head90 | ^{We Believe!} 08:04, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to WNYW if this isn't found to be notable in its own right. What's the guideline for establishing notability of TV news programs anyway? §everal⇒|Times 16:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG, also no claim of notability. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:08, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:25, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. —ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 12:16, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 12:16, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:15, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: A reasonable fork from the channel station. Though its an NYC-based show, it does have some independent notability due to its age and prominence. This show gets media coverage in non-NYC markets, e.g., [1]. Typical morning shows in small cities like Tampa Bay, yes, I agree they would not be notable.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 05:11, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - One reliable source was found by user:Milowent above to refute the nomination. Nomination rationale of the topic being insufficiently notable outside of NYC (a metropolitan area) as a reason to delete the article entirely isn't based upon WP:BEFORE, nor is the rationale of being a "regular" newscast, "regular" being a weasel word in the context of the statement, as no definition of "regular" is provided by the nominator. Northamerica1000^(talk) 10:54, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't think I needed to define "regular" but lets try this: every day, normal, run of the mill newscast. Also, how does one article about one event 20 years ago establish notability? CRRays Head90 | ^{We Believe!} 17:21, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a very signifigant news show, in one of Americas most signifigant cities, watched daily by millions of people, very valuable to wikipedia in my opinion. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 03:04, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Show gets coverage not just in the New York Times as was already found in the last AFD, but other places as well. http://www.eonline.com/news/the_soup/learning_news_you_report_it_on_good_day/195624 for instance. The show has been on since 1988, so surely a lot of people watch it. Dream Focus 00:23, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.