Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gonneke Spits

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Dakota 21:34, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gonneke Spits[edit]

This artical does not appear to meet the Notability(People) criteria and also appears is in violation of the Biographies of Living People, Biased or malicious content Policy.Mark1800 04:11, 9 October 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: Mark1800 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.[reply]

  • This is an attack page. I'll tag it for the admins. --Aaron 18:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is most certainly not an attack page. Every single section has numerous sources in blockquoted citation format. :In fact, virtually the entire article is simply that, blockquoted citations from reputable sources in proper cited format. There is virtually no paraphrasing whatsoever. Yours, Smeelgova 21:01, 9 October 2006 (UTC). — Possible single purpose account: Smeelgova (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic. — Note to closing admin: Smeelgova (talk • contribs) is the creator of the article that is the subject of this AfD.[reply]
After reviewing this artical, I'm curious why
  1. It was not deleted when the original request for speedy deletion was made.
  2. Why this artical is mainly about Werner Erhard.
As the previous requestor for speedy deletion said, Hanging around someone notable is not notability.
Mark1800 07:52, 10 October 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: Mark1800 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.[reply]
  • delete. Every paragraph seems to start with "at one time, Gonneke Spits knew Werner Erhard, who has done this, that.....". yandman 08:01, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, nonsensical attack page. --Aaron 14:33, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, as stated above, this is NOT an attack page, but a carefully researched article utilizing numerous blockquoted citation's and cited references. Smeelgova 14:58, 10 October 2006 (UTC). — Note to closing admin: Smeelgova (talk • contribs) is the creator of the article that is the subject of this AfD.[reply]
  • Please let us all stay away from personal attacks and labeling, and keep to the nature of this debate, which is to discuss the notability or non-notability of the individual above. It could certainly be argued that numerous other editors included the one who started this debate also have Wikipedia:Single purpose account's, and I would certainly be within my rights to go around Wikipedia labeling and personally attacking them as well, but I have not done so. Let's all at least try to maintain a modicum of decorum here please, thank you. Yours, Smeelgova 16:56, 10 October 2006 (UTC).[reply]
    • However, if we are not agreeing to be civil and going around labeling single purpose accounts, I will be forced to do so as well. My apologies, Smeelgova 17:05, 10 October 2006 (UTC).[reply]
  • Delete, my concerns are listed above. Mark1800 21:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC) (FYI: with regards to the single purpose account comment, I have listed all pages I have edited this year, on my user page, I would love my accusers, to do the same, sigh. I dragged myself into this mess ,when I tried to correct some incorrect facts and got slammed. I have since devoted my time to reading the refferences and attempting to correct.[reply]
  • Delete. This article is really about Warner Erhard. Any appropriate content should be edited into his article. -Kubigula (ave) 16:12, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. 1) The individual is not notable as a wikipedia bio subject. 2) The content is merely salacious unsubstantiated gossip. 3) The sources cited do not meet adequate criteria for verifiability, especially for defamatory content relating to living persons. 4) This is part of an extended network of articles created, or extensively edited, by Smeelgova, with a common theme of disparaging Werner Erhard and/or persons or organisations associated with him (a feature shared by almost every single one of the several thousand contributions by this user since his appearance a few months ago). DaveApter 15:54, 13 October 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: DaveApter (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.[reply]
  • Delete. This is another in a series of salacious attack articles hiding behind other people's quoted POV material. Alex Jackl 16:27, 13 October 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: AJackl (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.[reply]
  • Delete This is yet another article that has earned the privilege of deletion. Sm1969 16:55, 13 October 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: Sm1969 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.[reply]
  • Delete per Kubigula, no attempt to establish independent notability. Derex 17:40, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Morton devonshire 21:23, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gonneke_Spits&oldid=1137884409"