Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gomhoriat Shebin SC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Yash^talk stalk 04:32, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gomhoriat Shebin SC[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails wp:ORG -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 05:12, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - As the creator of this article i don't think that it should be deleted. This article is about a small football club in Egypt which is currently playing in the Egyptian Second Division, the second tier in the Egyptian football league system, and due to the lack of sources I couldn't add more info to this article. Once i find any sources about the club history, current squad and other info i'll immediately add it to the article. Ben5218 (talk) 14:38, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
lack oif sources is a pretty good indication that a subject is not notable. per WP:GNG -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 15:03, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What lack of sources - a quick Google News shows thousands. Looks like a WP:BEFORE failure. Nfitz (talk) 04:49, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~:::i'm not seeign any results under the article title... -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 04:54, 7 May 2017 (UTC)~~[reply]

i didn't think to try and translate to arabic. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 04:57, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - participated in the 2016 Egypt Cup thus meeting the club notability criteria of WP:FOOTYN. I don't know where user:aunva6 comment of lack of sources comes from - a quick look in Google News shows thousands of articles. Also, from a simple common sense perspective - does it really seem likely that a league that is only one level below fully-professional would actually be so low-quality that the teams themselves wouldn't be notable? Nfitz (talk) 04:41, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
i was not aware of footyn... i only knew of WP:NSPORT and WP:ORG. besides, i just looked at google news, and I fail to see these results you're talking about... -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 04:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you click on the link I provided above? I literally see thousands of hits (though I didn't page past the first two pages). Nfitz (talk) 13:13, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per above, appears notable. However please notee that WP:FOOTYN is an old WikiProject-specific guide, it hasn't been updated in years really. Giant Snowman 09:49, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It may not have been updated in a while - but it reflects the long-standing consensus here - that teams that have played in a national-level cup are notable. I don't see anything that needs updating - and anyone can update if they feel it is out of date. But do we really expect the 2nd-highest level of football, and first non-fully professional level of football in a football-mad country like Egypt not to be notable? Nfitz (talk) 13:13, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Has played in national competition. Current consensus in AfD still aligns to statements made in WP:FOOTYN. Fenix down (talk) 09:34, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.