Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golf Elementary School District 67

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:46, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Golf School District 67

Primary schools are generally not notable, generally it is only high schools that are listed. I find no reason why this school has any reason to be listed based on its notability. It also fails the proposed guideline WP:SCHOOL TheRanger 13:56, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: "After changes made to the article it is now clear that this is a whole school district and not one elementary school. Based on these facts I now think that the article should be kept. I would like to withdraw my nomination." TheRanger 16:12, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom nn--Jusjih 15:37, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is a spot to talk about this school in the Morton Grove, Illinois article. No notability (WP:N, WP:SCHOOL) is claimed in the article or documented via multiple nontrivial articles in newspapers, like historical significance, awards won, athletic prowess, famous alumni, or high test scores.Edison 18:05, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Solid Keep — Waaa...? This is a school district, not a school. School districts are generally considered notable. So the above commentary makes no sense. This article is correctly following the proposed WP:SCHOOLS guidelines by merging in school information. — RJH (talk) 21:50, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per RJHall, verifiable and meets both the letter and spirit of WP:SCHOOLS. This is is the type of article we should be merging small 2 sentence stubs into. RFerreira 00:57, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep It took me several times to understand the article and the web site, but this is not an "elementary school" in "district 67", it's "elementary school district" number 67, which has multiple schools within the district. It's amazing what you can find out just by reading! School districts are inherently notable and meet all qualifications for retention. Furthermore, the entire justification for this AfD is irrelevant and invalid. Nomination should be withdrawn. Alansohn 11:58, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- pointless nomination to the editors that schoolwatch regularly turns out for AFDs. --ForbiddenWord 14:19, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course school districts are notable. ;-) Silensor 17:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and allow for organic growth. Bahn Mi 02:24, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all schools. ALKIVAR™ 20:30, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the above. --Myles Long 06:37, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.