Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goldmines Telefilms Pvt Ltd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Goldmines Telefilms Pvt Ltd

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Repeatedly recreated by multiple editors over the last few months. Time to decide whether it is notable and can have an article (at a better title), or not notable and then new versions can be G4 deleted and title variations salted. See Draft:Goldmines Picture, Goldmines Telefilms Pvt. Ltd, Draft:Goldmines Telefilms Pvt. Ltd., and Goldmines Telefilms (perhaps others as well?). Fram (talk) 10:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think the topic is notable and have backing of sources. I provided quite a few at the article.Success think (talk) 11:27, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Nothing to show independent notability, fails WP:GNG, WP:NCORP. Sources need to have significant coverage on the company, not on specific productions. There is an existing draft that should be worked on until accepted by a reviewer. Ravensfire (talk) 14:57, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The subject is notable, and I'm working on its development, give sometim. I also provided refs to verification. Dharma Productions have article than why not this production ? Have petients.Success think (talk) 16:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Some notability, but not really enough to keep it intact. Glucken123 (talk) 19:40, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Success think, that's why there is a draft article, where it CAN be worked on and developed with patience. When it's in main article space, it needs to be in decent shape. Sources need to be about the COMPANY primary, not about a particular production. Ravensfire (talk) 16:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ravensfire: I did some work, are you satisfied the sub is notable. As far I know 2 or 3 refs is also enough on WP and I also saw many articles are present her without a single source. This sub is notable. Success think (talk) 17:00, 21 January 2022 (UTC) I add more data in Goldmines article & provided 12 refs. I think it is notable now and no need to delete it. So close this discussion.Success think (talk) 18:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Another promotional effort from undisclosed paid editors. The subject fails NCORP. This article relies heavily on one citation (used many times) that is an interview. Much of the rest is routine or churnalism. I checked one source that doesn't support assertions in the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:46, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Company does not have any real significance or any real news reports. It is just known as a dubbing company but that is about it. I would suggest it gets moved to the draft space or just entirely deleted it does not even have any purpose to be present. SP013 (talk) 06:35, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SP013: Sir, I wrote this article & I'm not a paid editor. I got into this sub just 'cause of Pushpa : The Rise, I added more data into it and if you fellow editors think it's not worth to have page on WP, tell me without wasting time, I put some work on it. I'll not add anything now into it. If you it's not follow WP: NOTABLE than your free, But Economic Times have all the information about this firm, ET is notable newspaper of India and you can also add.Success think (talk) 07:37, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP: Notablity WP:GNG.Success think (talk) 17:44, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.