Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golden root

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. The redirect will be restored. ✗plicit 05:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Golden root[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not able to find much of anything about the topic. The phrase was coined by Laura Rockhold who doesn't appear notable herself nor a subject-matter expert. Topic doesn't appear to have any widespread usage. ––FormalDude (talk) 05:39, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Poetry. ––FormalDude (talk) 05:39, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTEVERYTHING. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:25, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect? Disambiguate? I created this page as a redirect to Rhodiola rosea. There was already a capitalized redirect, Golden Root. Google searches for "golden root" bring up many results as a common name for the plant. There is an incoming link from Wikipedia:Missing_science_topics/Maths11. Searches for golden root+math, bring up the value 1.272 (the square root of the golden ration). Plantdrew (talk) 15:45, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Golden root is not a phrase, it is a new, official poetic form. It was invented by Laura Rockhold in 2022, who is a poet and the subject matter expert. As of now, Rockhold's golden root has been published in Black Fox Literary Magazine, been recognized by the League of Minnesota Poets and is forthcoming in other literary journals. 97.127.51.105 (talk) 01:23, 9 July 2023 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: 97.127.51.105 (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. [reply]

Delete & Restore Redirect to Rhodiola rosea - There are no sources in the article actually discussing the topic, and searches turned up absolutely no coverage on it in reliable sources. The phrase was a valid redirect to the topic of Rhodiola rosea before, so this current article on this non-notable topic should be deleted and the redirect restored. Rorshacma (talk) 01:46, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep & Restore Redirect to Rhodiola rosea at the top of the Golden root page. The golden root poetic form is new as of 2022; it is established and published with additional publications forthcoming. Black Fox Literary Magazine and the League of Minnesota Poets are reliable sources who have published and recognized the golden root poetic form. 97.127.51.105 (talk) 02:06, 9 July 2023 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: 97.127.51.105 (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. [reply]
Delete (or redirect if a suitable target can be found). Seems to be a realtively new form that has not yet attracted the significant coverage in independent reliable sources that means it would meet WP:GNG. Please ping me if good sources are idntified. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 09:58, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: How about this suggestion, the current article is draftified and the redirect is restored?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:19, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and restore redirect per above, this is a non-notable neologism and also possibly promotional. SportingFlyer T·C 16:16, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and restore redirect per above. Not seeing sufficient coverage (or really any coverage) to justify a merge here. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 01:18, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.