Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golden Stars International

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 23:13, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Stars International[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mid-price compilation non notable. Has failed to appear on any notable music chart. Lack of significant coverage by reliable sources. Kekkomereq2 (talk) 18:55, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:04, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Fails WP:MUSIC criteria. Ray^Talk 11:36, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, see WP:MUSIC; almost all albums are notable enough for articles, and I've yet to see a convincing argument as to why this one isn't. Ironholds (talk) 13:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I would not argue that this album fails WP:MUSIC which states that in general, an album by a notable artist "may" have sufficient notability for an article. What seems to happen more often in practice (and what I think the guideline should reflect) is that a non-charting compilation of previously-released material is generally not notable. A very popular artist may have been the subject of dozens of budget- and mid-priced generic compilations, and in my view most of these are not worthy of separate articles. ReverendWayne (talk) 18:46, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this album. Joe Chill (talk) 22:05, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.