Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golden Dalek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Then redirect to Dalek variants. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-04-08 10:03Z

Golden Dalek[edit]

Appears to be made up. Googling "Dalek Thoyr" turns up zero hits. Emurphy42 05:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

EX-TERM-IN-ATE!!! (couldn't resist). Or rather, redirect to Dalek variants#Dalek Supreme like Gold Dalek does. MER-C 13:26, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete current contents, then redirect to Dalek variants. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per WP:FICT to Dalek variants (I don't believe a redirect should point to a section header). No need to merge; article's contents are unsourced and lack any context. Barno 17:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect seems like the logical course of action here. Acalamari 23:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. I believe redirecting to a section header is fine; I've definitely seen it done before. Emurphy42 06:09, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- contents are fictive, and non-canon. The Golden Dalek per se was originated in the TV21 strip and is only marginally-canonical. -- Simon Cursitor 13:48, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and then Redirect, per Andrew Lenahan — this entry, along with most of the other contributions of MrFijiax (talk · contribs), appears to be completely his own creation. As Simon notes, there was a golden Dalek in a Doctor Who comic strip once, but that's not what this article appears to be about. To that end, the original content should be scrubbed from the page's history, and the page turned into a redirect. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 08:21, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete, fictional nonsense. -- Flutefluteflute ^Talk ^{Contributions} 08:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.