Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gold Tea (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:57, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gold Tea[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One is a meta-reference to a hoax article; the other two are partial title matches, and the "green tea with gold leaf" is not supported by the source which seems to be a personal website anyway. There is no specific entity on Wikipedia by the exact name "gold tea", so this is an invalid disambig page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:21, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no articlespace content fulfills MOS:DABMENTION. MarginalCost (talk) 01:54, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Enwiki has no notable mentions of "Gold Tea". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we are not a search index per WP:PTM. I fail to see how this would help our readers more than just searching per WP:D Lightburst (talk) 22:37, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.