Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gold Coast bus route 700
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 06:35, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Gold Coast bus route 700 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable bus routes, All sources so far are just different numbered timetables, No evidence of notability, Fails GNG. (I have no objections to redirecting or merging, Thanks) –Davey2010Talk 01:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. No sources have been provided other than timetables. Individual bus routes are rarely notable anyway. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:27, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- delete bus routes even list of bus routes are not inherently notable. Article is based on primary sources. Being the only 24 hour service in Queensland is not a claim for notability otherwise we'd be creating articles for every 24 hour bus service in the world. LibStar (talk) 15:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Bus routes are not notable, and does not meet GNG. Doctorhawkes (talk) 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.