Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Godspower Oshodin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 16:02, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Godspower Oshodin[edit]

Godspower Oshodin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another covert UPE article on a non notable poet and “entrepreneur” who fails to satisfy any criterion from WP:POET and lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A before search links me to mere announcements, and user generated sources. Needless to say this article is an WP:ADMASQ. There is a claim in the article that the book has garnered positive reviews but I fail to see where, that is example of WP:ADMASQ. Celestina007 (talk) 12:19, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:19, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:19, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:19, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The only claim to notability is his book of poetry, which does not seem to have garnered wide critical attention. Mccapra (talk) 13:24, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:12, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no evidence of notability DGG ( talk ) 04:32, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.