Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/God Will Lift Up Your Head

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sock nom. Any editor in good standing is welcome to bring a nomination if this can't be handled editorially by possible Jars of Clay integration. Star Mississippi 01:53, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Give to the Winds Thy Fears (neé God Will Lift Up Your Head)[edit]

Give to the Winds Thy Fears (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Gaetr (talk) 23:39, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - unsourced since 2016? Yikes. Mention on the album page is enough, this didn't do anything worth speaking of. Tony Fox (arf!) 00:47, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Changing my input to redirect - Give to the Winds Thy Fears appears notable. A short mention of the Jars of Clay version there is probably more appropriate. User:Uncle G has already combined the two, it needs editing, but I find that to be fine. Tony Fox (arf!) 15:46, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not a notable song. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 02:19, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Unsourced since 2016 is nothing. The song is from 1653. The original title is "Befiehl du deine Wege" and Wesley's words were "God shall lift up thy head", although the first line that you'll generally find it listed under is "Give to the Winds Thy Fears", if you want to find it. The current article does give clues to this, but you do have to know that this is completely the wrong title for the actual well-documented subject. Uncle G (talk) 02:49, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • This is an interesting point. Should this possibly be a redirect instead? Something to consider. Tony Fox (arf!) 03:29, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I think this is an article about the remix, not the original, and unless you can convince me other, I'd go for delete CT55555 (talk) 04:24, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • An obvious keep. Drmies (talk) 23:46, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.