Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goatgyan
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:10, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- Goatgyan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable company whose article reads like an advertisement. No reliable sources have covered the company and all the data is sourced from their own website. Fails WP:GNG let alone WP:CORPDEPTH Jupitus Smart 08:24, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 10:17, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 10:17, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 12:29, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - advertorial, no indication of notability. "Most searched web portal for goat farming in India", my favourite phrase of the day :) --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:03, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Zero hits on Google News is quite an achievement! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:37, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: An article whose text is setting out the firm's wares, but without a sustainable claim to encyclopaedic notability. Searches are turning up nothing beyond routine listings. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 09:11, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. I removed most of the article as it was spam, unreferenced and WP is not a PR platform. -- HighKing++ 16:57, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.