Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goat Farming

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G5, unattributed copy paste. A good faith creation with proper sourcing can be done without having to ask me or taking this to DRV. —SpacemanSpiff 17:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Goat Farming[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Much of the material appears to have been copied (without attribution) from Goat#Agriculture. The new material is in poor English and does not appear to add significantly to the content of Goat#Agriculture. David Biddulph (talk) 04:18, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because this article is separate article from the content of another article Goat#Agriculture. There are some more citations and additional contents too. I was just trying to create separate article for Goat#Agriculture. Nepali keto62_{Questions?!?!?} 04:41, 17 July 2016 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I had PROD-ed the article before [1] with the reason "Does not expand on the existing article section on the topic in any significant way.", so the author pretty much just copied that article into his own and removed the PROD tag. GSMR (talk) 05:09, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:52, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and per WP:TNT. Though I do see that other editors have come along and cleaned up his Animal husbandry in Nepal and Poultry farming In Nepal. If people are willing to fix this article, in the same way, I suppose TNT wouldn't apply. I'm just not willing to, sorry. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:18, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Question I have not encountered WP:TNT before. Is the idea that the article is deleted and then re-written from scratch? This would overcome the lack of attribution for the start of the current article. If this is the case, I am willing to work on the re-writing. It would be in keeping with articles such as Sheep farming, Pig farming and Cattle-farming. DrChrissy ^(talk) 19:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- ~~@DrChrissy: yes please help to improve the quality of this article by adding something new. This article is useful in wikipedia.—Nepali keto62_{Questions?!?!?} 01:55, 18 July 2016 (UTC)~~ WP:SOCKSTRIKE — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - In that case, I'm going to strikethrough my delete !vote at this time, if editors are willing to help improve the article. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:15, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - ~~@Shawn in Montreal: Yes please improve this article. It is very important.—Nepali keto62_{Questions?!?!?} 13:09, 18 July 2016 (UTC)~~ WP:SOCKSTRIKE — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - @David Biddulph:'s comment about attribution is what I am concerned about. I do not want to work on an article which is later deleted because of this. It seems to me to be easiest to delete the article and start again to avoid further concerns about attribution. DrChrissy ^(talk) 17:25, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - Well, this Afd is far from over and DrChrissy, if you decide to actually !vote here, you might play a role in retaining this article. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:41, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT. Re-writing of the article from scratch will mean attribution concerns can be addressed. DrChrissy ^(talk) 19:00, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If this article is recreated by another editor after deletion, it should, of course, be titled Goat farming, not Goat Farming; the author of this version appears not to understand MOS:CAPS although it has been pointed out to him. David Biddulph (talk) 05:59, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi David. I have already noted this. You might want to take a look at my User page to see the lists of articles I have started and edited. Recreation will be in (hopefully) good hands, but input from others is always welcome. DrChrissy ^(talk) 11:17, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.