Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Go Go Amigo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No consensus to delete and article is indeed notable. (non-administrative closure) -- RyRy (talk) 10:41, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Go Go Amigo[edit]
- Go Go Amigo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete nn cartoon Mayalld (talk) 06:07, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I'd describe any Looney Tunes episode as notable: they're pretty much the gold standard of animated cartooning. The problem here is that the original article creator doesn't know how to turn off his cap lock key, and he cuts-and-pastes copyvios as articles. I've deleted the obvious copyvios and Dlohcierekim has been fixing up the others (he hasn't gotten to this one yet). I'd have no objection to the re-creation of the other episodes in an appropriate form, either. Acroterion (talk) 11:55, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above Acroterion's arguments I think there is sufficient media coverage here. The links I added help establish that. Any Daffy Duck cartoon is sufficiently notable for coverage here. At worst, it should be merged and redirected to List of Daffy Duck cartoons. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 15:00, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Only because Daffy Duck is notable. This is, arguably, the worst Daffy cartoon of them all -- but, of course, there is no category yet for WP:NoLousyCartoons. :) Ecoleetage (talk) 16:43, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep' - Needs to be wikified, categorized, referenced and labled as a stub, but I do believe that it is notable. --Pinkkeith (talk) 17:23, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Acroterion, Looney Tunes episodes should be presumed notable. -FrankTobia (talk) 05:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep as no valid rationale for deletion has been given. JuJube (talk) 02:05, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.