Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Go Dda Gareth (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR, per lack of significant participation.) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:46, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Go Dda Gareth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although I understand it was nominated and I was acknowledge some of the comments made there such as the BBC making it notable even if minimal, I think it may be time for another nom. There's no article for the author Lonna Bradley (which questions its notability if no article is present unless the book was more notable than author which it seems it's not the case here) and there's no linking articles at all therefore no move target. All my searches also found nothing good aside from the usual book links at browser. There's also basically nothing different at the cyr.wikipedia. Pinging previous commenters @Billinghurst, DGG, Whpq, and WilyD: SwisterTwister talk 05:05, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My opinion hasn't changed, beyond that <shrug> — billinghurst sDrewth 11:42, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:58, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - here is a review in Welsh, anybody who can read that around? Kraxler (talk) 16:41, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but rewrite as a bio of the author, who has written other books--low worldcat holdings, but that's irrelevant for q a book in Welsh. our having no bio of the author can be a sign of our incompleteness; we know WP is not a RS, having nothing in WP is is even less of a reliable source. The review is from Wales Book Council DGG ( talk ) 23:05, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 13:24, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.