Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoGoGo Airheart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) asilvering (talk) 01:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GoGoGo Airheart

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage of the band to be found anywhere. The article only relias on primary sources. The only argument for notability is that their albums were published by a notable indie label. In my opinion not enough to meet notability criteria. Broc (talk) 18:33, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Broc (talk) 18:33, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:35, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
'Weak keep haven't done a full search yet but did find an AllMusic staff written bio here together with album reviews here, here, here, and here, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:09, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Atlantic306: one single review still does not make the subject notable, as it is not covered by multiple reliable sources. Unless we find additional sources, I think the page should still be deleted. --Broc (talk) 22:19, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are four album reviews at AllMusic but I agree more is needed, Atlantic306 (talk) 13:36, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep moving to full keep in view of these additional sources: Pitcfork here and here, San Diego Reader here, Exclaim here and here, PopMatters here, and here and Denver Post [here to go with the four AllMusic sources. The music specific sources are listed as reliable at Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources. Overall there is enough coverage to pass WP:GNG in my view Atlantic306 (talk) 20:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for finding this sources! I would agree that it is sufficient coverage to fulfill WP:GNG. Would you like to move the sources over to the article, so that the effort was not in vain? Broc (talk) 11:49, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow a band with 6 LPs under their belt (https://rateyourmusic.com/artist/gogogo_airheart) isn't 'notable' enough for Wikipedia. This dude (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Hulewicz) produced less (and considerably worse) music, but no one's taking him down. 2A00:79E0:11:370:692B:E9CD:2888:94E3 (talk) 11:37, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let alone WP:OTHERSTUFF, Hulewicz recorded over a dozen albums between 1969 and 2013, a way longer and more productive career than that obscure and short-lived punk band. He was a Meritorious Activist of Culture, an Order of Polonia Restituta Knight's Cross and a Gloria Artis Medal recipient. He is featured in books about the history of Polish music. If your argument was intended to help the band, it is not. Cavarrone 09:25, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, passes WP:GNG, per the sources identified by Atlantic306. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 12:07, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.