Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gnoozle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 01:38, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gnoozle[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches simply found nothing better than these links (there's no move target for this orphan) and I considered PRODing this but I wanted comments especially from past editors Mcmatter and Graeme Bartlett. SwisterTwister talk 21:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:00, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - My only contribution was from 5 years ago and I tried to CSD it then, there have been no improvements and the article fails all notability thresholds.- McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 22:57, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it looks pretty non notable to me. I think a prod could have done the job too. I voted for software to be included in A7. But at that point it was not included. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:02, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 05:25, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.