Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gminutes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:41, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gminutes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only sources I can find for this software are PR releases. The claimed award seems utterly obscure. Pcap ping 01:40, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 01:41, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, promotional article for a software product with unsourced, dubious claims like being "the first cloud computing product." I can't find significant coverage other than press releases and the like. Glenfarclas (talk) 02:42, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no coverage, and reads like spam. ~ DC (Talk|Edits) 03:41, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a poorly written advertisement. --Webley455 (talk) 03:52, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, unambiguous advertising: GMinutes is your one stop meeting minutes management solution for professionally executing meetings. All you have to do is create your meeting space, add relevant people to it and you are good to go. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 17:15, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 00:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - pretty blatant advertising, doesn't appear to satisfy any notability guidelines either. Cocytus [»talk«] 04:31, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, blatant advertising indeed. JBsupreme (talk) 05:08, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, blatant spam advert, non-notable, the single reference is a self posted article. Delete as WP:N, should have been speedied. --DustyRain (talk) 19:33, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yet another waste of time AfD where the spammers get a free week of advertising. Miami33139 (talk) 22:21, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.