Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glossary of terms for fuel cell power systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:07, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Glossary of terms for fuel cell power systems

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub with unsure notability. Beagel (talk) 19:44, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not even a glossary. Epic fail of WP:PUTEFFORT. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:56, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I couldn't believe it but it is indeed missing the glossary since creation years ago --DeVerm (talk) 20:22, 3 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:36, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:36, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think the article is supposed to be about a book. Either way, the book doesn't seem to be notable.--Bte99 (talk) 03:54, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Smerge - selectively merge any useful information into the Fuel cell article as suggested in another AfD. Bearian (talk) 15:42, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not really sure what the article is about. It certainly isn't what it says it is. —Yk Yk Yk talk ~ contrib 01:46, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.