Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glossary of quality management
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:50, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Glossary of quality management[edit]
- Glossary of quality management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Wikipedia is not a dictionary, Wikipedia articles are not whole dictionaries, and this one is. - ∅ (∅), 01:15, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as copywrite violation, [1] is a large part of it. meshach 03:09, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Meshach. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 03:14, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per copyvio and it does not belong in WP anyway. --Seattle Skier (talk) 05:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Meshach Nick Catalano contrib talk 15:51, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, but on the grounds of a misspelling, not per Meshach above - the correct term is copyright, not copywrite. Homonyms, people! --Dennisthe2 21:53, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT - Wikipedia isn't a dictionary. — Wenli 02:36, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.