Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glochowsky's law

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was: Speedily deleted - hoax, useless article with no context.

Glochowsky's law[edit]

Probable hoax. It was prodded but the creator removed the prod tag and the hoax warning without adding sources or anything. Delete as unverifiable. (Note that as much as I like prod, it doesn't work so well for bad-faith articles, since the creator just removes the tag, so hoaxes should probably come straight here anyway.) NickelShoe 15:15, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as hoax. No relevant Ghits. Fan1967 15:22, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax, nothing on google. "A device can't be smaller than its parts", color me unsurprised. Weregerbil 15:31, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete hoax -- Alpha269 15:44, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete hoax or possibly crankcruft. JoshuaZ 16:27, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax. dbtfz ^talk 21:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per well argued nomination. ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 23:13, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. It's kind of obvious anyway. -- Mithent 00:41, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete as hoax. --Trafton 01:09, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. as WP:V, has a verifiability problem. Strong possibility of being a hoax.--Royal Blue 06:27, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing on search engines Wangfoo 00:23, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not even funny. Pavel Vozenilek 23:04, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.