Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Globasa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 18:39, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Globasa[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable, nascent personal project. The only sources provided are the project's own website. A web search only returns WP:UGC on reddit, fandom, and its own wiki. WP:CRYSTAL - the opening line says it all, "Globasa is a planned international auxiliary language devised by Hector Ortega", it embodies ambition but is only as yet a personal project. Cabayi (talk) 12:55, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 12:55, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 12:55, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Hardly any independent coverage for this constructed language. See also here what happened to the article on Pandunia. Robin van der Vliet (talk) (contribs) 21:48, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 17:08, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:SPS. No independent sources found.--Darius (talk) 20:29, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.