Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Globalization in India

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Consensus is problems can be solved by editing Star Mississippi 20:53, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Globalization in India[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is just one large WP:OR and WP:SYNTH essay. The content in this essay might be belong in various forms on articles such as History of India, Economic history of India, or Economy of India, but has no encyclopedic value as a standalone article. Thenightaway (talk) 23:41, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Politics, Economics, and India. Skynxnex (talk) 02:51, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Trim I agree that the article reads as an essay, with analysis rather than just reporting. For example One event that helped India immensely was when Netscape went public on 9 August 1995. And There is a food security crisis in India because a significant portion of the land has been designated to grow crops for biofuel. Crops like rice and wheat are often harvested in large quantities. However, the amount of crops that are used for biofuel is largely unregulated, with an inadequate amount going to the poor and needy. However, there is also much useful and interesting referenced material. I recommend that, if the article is kept, it be brutally edited to remove every paragraph or sentence that does not have an adequate citation (noting that sometimes the citation for a sentence comes with the sentence before, and that sometimes the justifying citation is to another Wikipedia page, of course.) This will give a much smaller and focussed article. Rick Jelliffe (talk) 01:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The topic is notable but the content is a mess. Could be a WP:TNT job? Aszx5000 (talk) 23:27, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:46, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 00:32, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the topic is clearly notable. The text needs work but it's not obviously in WP:TNT territory as it's intelligible and for the most part appropriately cited. Some experienced copy-editing would help. I think this is a KEEP as far as AfD is concerned. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as notable. I'd consider a merge to Economy of India, but then it would need to be WP:SIZESPLIT back out anyway, and this exists as a valid child article. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 17:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify/Merge This is an awful lot of synthesis, attributing a development and social concepts to globalization without narrowing this admittedly broad concept into a cohesive article. The Payments section is a duplicate of Economy_of_India#Balance_of_payments, the Investments section duplicates Economy_of_India#Foreign_direct_investment, the Remittances section duplicates Economy_of_India#Remittances. The Women section is vague, and although this can be tied to international companies I don't think increased access to education is strong thesis here. The Education section is likewise vague without direct discussion of globalization. I'm baffled what this Health section is doing here. The Historical Context section is similarly vague, where "India" could be replaced with the name of any other country. Trimming what isn't relevant or what is duplicative leaves little unique or useful content, so a redirect to Economy of India may be appropriate – the noted sections should not just be removed from the main article. Something being conceived as notable doesn't mean it needs a stand-alone article. Reywas92^Talk 21:37, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.