Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global censorship of Youth's books
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete per WP:SNOW -Djsasso (talk) 13:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Global censorship of Youth's books[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Global censorship of Youth's books (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Global censorship of books for children. The ugly title could easily be fixed. But is it oroginal research? -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 11:10, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete a original research essay. We already have a few similar articles that says the same things slightly better Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 12:29, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per Doc Strange -- clearly a rambling OR essay.Doug Weller (talk) 16:12, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as OR. — scetoaux (T|C) 21:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as it is a total rowing utensil. JuJube (talk) 01:36, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Do NOT Delete This is a draft for course. Please leave unaltered until May 15, 2008. Thanks. pvh —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.212.9.9 (talk) 14:37, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Someone hasn't read WP:Wikipedia is not a place to store drafts for a courseDoug Weller (talk) 14:54, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete original research is prohibited on Wikipedia. Hut 8.5 20:49, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete - As obvious OR material. Enigma message 21:07, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as WP:OR. While it is a student's project, this seems to be beyond cleanup at present. (No prejudice against a well-written and policy-compliant recreation though). Bfigura (talk) 21:24, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The article, in its present form, should probably be deleted. Nothing to say a well referenced and article-style section couldn't be included in Censorship though. Avruch T 21:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Wikipedia is not a free webhost. Nakon 21:55, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This is clearly synthesis, which, while entirely desirable in an academic essay, is not permitted on Wikipedia. Aleta Sing 22:54, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not compliant with wikipedia policies, specifically WP:OR. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 23:07, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Pay for your webhosting Like the rest of us. Smite and salt. ThuranX (talk) 23:46, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - good as a class essay, but not as a Wikipedia article. There's just not enough prior (read: non-original) research on the subject. --clpo13(talk) 00:06, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an OR essay. Grsztalk 00:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I say! WP:OR and all that. X Marx The Spot (talk) 00:49, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the above, as original research. AecisBrievenbus 00:56, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I think it's snowing. Bfigura (talk) 06:27, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.