Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Warming Wikia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by Anthony.bradbury. Arkyan  ^(talk) 17:16, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Global Warming Wikia[edit]

My original PROD read "Non-notable, fails WP:ATT, Special:Statistics page unimpressive as well". It was removed by an anon stating that the third thing is not a criteria for deletion, which is true. However, this still fails to address the first two issues (failing WP:ATT and lacking notability per WP:WEB). Anyways, this gets 3 Google hits as well and has only a small user base. Delete as lacking notability and attributability. Wickethewok 13:16, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non notable unless some sources can be provided. The wikia has only 28 articles written on it. Also, many of the articles are simply mirror articles of what appears on Wikipedia. Take this one for example about Global Warming [1], and compare it to the Wikipedia article on Global Warming. Ask yourself this: Do we need an article about an article that restates what we already have here? I think not. --Cyrus Andiron 13:24, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Here's another one [2]. Compare that to Global_Atmosphere_Watch. I'm assuming they are all this way. --Cyrus Andiron 13:28, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete no assertion of notability, other than it exists. —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-20 14:56Z
Speedy delete This article is a joke, Global Warming isn't even real anyway. WalterWalrus3 16:07, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Note to Walrus: it doesn't matter whether global warming is real. Like most reasonable people, I believe that space aliens are not real. Does that mean we should delete articles about them? It's verifiability that matters, not factuality. Now to the point: these folks aren't halfway notable. YechielMan 17:00, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per notability. Just a copy-paste of Wikipedia. ~ UBeR 17:14, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. - No assertion of notability and no references. Adambro 18:08, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable, no sources. -Will Beback · † · 20:57, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - doesn't assert notability. MER-C 12:12, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.