Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Urban History

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted per A7. (non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Global Urban History[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable term/field which seems to have only been studied by the group who coined it. It is currently only sourced by the group's own website and blog. I can find no independent, reliable sources discussing the subject. Sarahj2107 (talk) 12:59, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If kept it certainly shouldn't be title cased: it's not a proper noun. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a non-notable WP:NEOLOGISM. Joe Roe (talk) 14:46, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable. It's still too much of a niche study. Created by SPA Ezequiel33, this group from Berlin has been pushing their work on the blog, twitter, facebook, etc. and it looks like Wikipedia was another stop on the social media promotion tour. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:42, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per WP:A7 and WP:A11, author previously removed CSD template A7 yesterday and was warned for such. Placed templates and made notification. RegistryKey^(RegEdit) 07:25, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.