Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Adjustments (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:56, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global Adjustments[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable company. references do not show the notability of the subject. lack of significant coverage with in-depth information on the company GermanKity (talk) 05:02, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 05:02, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 05:02, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:GNG, a search brought up only primary sources. Devonian Wombat (talk) 06:28, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NCORP. Thank you for nominating this. It is interesting to note that it was kept in its first discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Adjustments. The sources cited by those users - most of them don't exists any more except 1 [1] which also reads very ad-like. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 03:47, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources appear to be routine coverage stories when they started/as per their press conference, while others are op-ed by the founder. Lovelife11111 (talk) 09:17, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.