Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 613
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:41, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Gliese 613 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:29, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Gong show 18:43, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. I was unable to find the nontrivial publications about this object required for WP:NASTRO #3 and it doesn't seem to pass any of the other criteria either. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:24, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect to List of stars in Norma per WP:NASTHELP: it has a couple of mentions, but no significant studies published. Praemonitus (talk) 01:55, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 18:49, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 22:44, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.