Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 269
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No prejudice towards redirection. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:55, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Gliese 269 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO. StringTheory11 (t • c) 23:20, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Does not satisfy WP:GNG. Praemonitus (talk) 04:35, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It's included in List of nearest bright stars which is "a table of stars found within 15 parsecs (48.9 light-years) of the Sun that have an absolute magnitude of +8.5 or brighter". Would a redirect there be appropriate? --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:48, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Merge and redirect as above. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:28, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to a combined article, possibly on near solar class K stars. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:18, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NASTRO. Not bright enough nor near enough to be independently notable in the absence of publications specifically about it. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:11, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.