Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Sorensen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 05:04, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Glenn Sorensen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Could not find reliable information as to why this individual is important and/or unique in any way. Tinton5 (talk) 02:37, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I know zip about contemporary artists, but the Museum of Modern Art has some of this guy's work[1], and he's had articles devoted to him in Frieze[2] and Art & Australia. Plus, duuh, there are a couple of dozen articles/reviews listed in his article. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:01, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- Per above, and 2002 groupshow at Royal Academy; 5 solo exhibitions in the same Netherlands gallery are not 'local' for an artist working in Sweden, although it seems to be his main venue. Dru of Id (talk) 03:11, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Like Clarityfiend, I know zilch about modern art. But I've actually heard of this guy. - Jorgath (talk) 18:22, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.