Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn M. Wagner

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:04, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Glenn M. Wagner[edit]

Glenn M. Wagner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable local pastor lacking non-trivial support. References are either listings, announcements, or about his retirement. Appears to be WP:MILL. reddogsix (talk) 17:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:32, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:14, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:34, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:34, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:35, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Basically still an ordinary pastor, since loads of pastors now write a book at some time during their career. The subject seems to fail WP:GNG. StAnselm (talk) 19:45, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- He has probably had a distinguished career, but not a notable one in WP terms. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:36, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.