Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Humplik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:33, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Glenn Humplik

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notability, unreferenced, information fuelled mostly by WP:OR and speculation over his relationship with Tom Green. _EricLeb⁰¹ (Page | Talk) 05:59, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. Jeremjay 24 14:47, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Marginal notability, mainly only known through Tom Green. But still, unreferenced is not a reason to delete, with a little editing and referencing I think this could turn out OK. This article has been around since 2007, and the page-view statistics justify keeping it, because it fills that gap in knowledge that readers come to Wikipedia to seek. Net benefit to Wikipedia to keep and improve IMO. -- œ ^™ 12:17, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:43, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This person has received some coverage but its in reference to his minor role on the Tom Green Show. Not notable enough for a dedicated article. He could be adequately covered in the show article. Selectively merge (removing the original reserch), then delete.--RadioFan (talk) 11:42, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.