Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Docherty (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NW (Talk) 20:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Glenn Docherty

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable local councillor, fails Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Politicians, the provided references do not support any notability. This article reads more like a CV than a biography useful to Wikipedia. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:23, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN and per previous Afd. ukexpat (talk) 15:25, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 15:25, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 15:26, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 15:26, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete definate fails WP:POLLIE as a counciler/deputy mayor neither is notable, the questions lies in SA YA Winner '09 IMHO a state award isnt sufficient to stand alone when considering notability. probable COI in article creator even SPA with the another wouldnt oppose salting by closing admin. Gnan garra 16:30, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No evidence of notability. fails POLITICIAN. Kittybrewster ☎ 10:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete almost looks like WP:AUTOBIO. Fails WP:BIO in any case, hardly any genuine third party coverage [1]. LibStar (talk) 12:00, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as recreation of deleted article without improvement. THF (talk) 15:48, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.