Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Chivers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:56, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glenn Chivers

Non-notable Australian rules footballer. No evidence to support notbaility using multiple reliable sources provided. Yet to play a first team game and does not therefore meet WP:ATHLETE Mattinbgn\^talk 23:43, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 23:45, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- fails WP:ATHLETE. - Longhair\^talk 23:50, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:06, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't meet notability guidelines. Shell ^babelfish 03:22, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we do not create articles for people who have not yet reached top competition level at their sport. Michellecrisp (talk) 06:01, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete full of fail. JBsupreme (talk) 06:18, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't meet wikipedias notability guidelines. AlwaysOnion (talk) 19:07, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, has yet to play at a fully professional level, as far as I can tell. If he eventually debuts in the AFL, then we can recreate the article. However, a debut at the top level seems far from certain for Chivers at this point. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 07:16, 24 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.