Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glendon Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unanimity that this organisation fails our notability requirements. Just Chilling (talk) 20:40, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Glendon Association[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no evidence of notability--no substantial third party sources--part of a promotional campaign for articles relating to Robert Firestone DGG ( talk ) 20:37, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The best source I can find is this article from the Santa Barbara Independent, and even that barely gives any coverage to this organization itself. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 07:59, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:29, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:29, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:29, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A worthy cause, but that doesn't mean it meets WP:SIGCOV. Marquardtika (talk) 20:00, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Appreciate what good they do to the society but it does not meet GNG Alex-h (talk) 08:55, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.