Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gleipnir (Ace Combat)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Ace Combat X: Skies of Deception. MBisanz ^talk 13:56, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gleipnir (Ace Combat)

This fictional item does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 18:46, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. TTN (talk) 18:53, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Original research does not pay. MuZemike (talk) 20:58, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, more plot rehash. Nifboy (talk) 23:57, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Generally there is no need for separate articles on fictional weapons, so it should be proposed for a merge. It seems from this and the game article Ace Combat X: Skies of Deception that this weapon is a key element in the game, but the main article gives almost no information. Therefore just a redirect is inappropriate, and a merge of the content is necessary. DGG (talk) 20:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Some very minor expansion may be required in the game article, but so little that calling it a merge is only a technicality.Kww (talk) 23:47, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

surely deciding how much should be merged is an editing question, not one for AfD. And anyway we'd need the redirect. DGG (talk) 04:34, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and it looks like an anon already merged it to List of nations of Ace Combat... ^-talk- the_ed17 ^-contribs- 15:35, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.