Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glasgow smile (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:29, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Glasgow smile[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Glasgow smile (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a very notable topic, currently completely unsourced, and lacks context to assert notability. Edit history includes many cultural references (mostly pop-culture) in which this particular attack was used. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 18:53, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I found three reference from a reasonable sources (The Daily Express, The Independent, and The Sun (newspaper)): [1],[2],[3]. I think the current state of the article (with all of the pop culture rubbish removed) is acceptable. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:13, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Question - Why so serious? --Explodicle (T/C) 19:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - the sources provided above demonstrate that this is a real injury, and this phrase is commonly used (at least in the UK) to describe it. If there are too many pop-culture examples, that's a problem for cleanup, not deletion. Robofish (talk) 22:57, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I would have thought "chelsea smile" the more common term though. Artw (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Passes WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 01:00, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Gets news coverage. Dream Focus 01:46, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Ohnoitsjamie. The amount of coverage in reliable sources gives this topic notability. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 22:28, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Snowball: Its reliably sourced! Notability established. Suede67 (talk) 22:25, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.